The role of quality assurance in Malta’s new accreditation standards by the MFHEA
- 14 April 2025
- Posted by: Sergio Passariello
- Category: Quality Assurance

While Malta continues to position itself as a reliable centre for higher education in the Euro-Mediterranean region, the quality of its educational institutions and qualifications remains in the spotlight. In response to global trends and domestic needs, the Malta Authority for Higher and Higher Education (MFHEA) has recently updated its accreditation standards for higher and higher education providers.
Â
At the heart of this transformation is a clear priority: strengthening quality assurance mechanisms . This article aims to explore the critical role of quality assurance in the new MFHEA standards and its implications for Malta’s institutions, students and educational future.
Â
A new framework in the name of transparency and consistency
Â
The revised accreditation process introduced by the MFHEA aims to align Malta’s educational ecosystem with the European Standards and Guidelines (ESG) for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). MFHEA Malta’s focus on quality assurance reflects a broader vision, prioritizing continuous improvement, data-driven assessment and accountability.
Â
Under the new system, institutions are required not only to demonstrate their compliance with academic and operational standards, but also to implement internal quality assurance frameworks that are systematic and measurable. This shift from a compliance-based model to a performance-oriented one marks a significant cultural shift in the way the quality of education is managed.
Â
What quality assurance means in practice
Â
Quality assurance is often misunderstood as a bureaucratic requirement. In fact, it is a critical process that ensures that institutions provide reliable, relevant, and effective education. The MFHEA’s updated accreditation standards bring this concept to the forefront, requiring institutions to demonstrate:
Â
-
- Clearly documented quality policies and procedures.
- Periodic internal audits and self-assessment processes.
- Active involvement of stakeholders, including students and employers.
- Mechanisms for continuous monitoring, feedback and improvement.
- Proof of staff qualifications and continuous professional development.
Â
The inclusion of these criteria within the accreditation process redefines the role of quality assurance from reactive to proactive. Institutions are now expected to integrate quality as a core value, visible in teaching, research, administration and student support services.
Â
Internal Quality Assurance: The Engine of Institutional Growth
Â
MFHEA’s approach promotes the development of internal quality assurance systems tailored to the context of each institution. Rather than imposing a one-size-fits-all model, the authority recognizes the different missions and capabilities of suppliers. Whether it is a vocational institute, an international university campus, or a local higher education institution, each must articulate how it ensures the quality of education on its own terms, supported by robust documentation and results.
Â
This decentralised model holds institutions accountable, but also places greater responsibility on their managers and staff. They now have to prove that quality assurance is not a task reserved for external audits, but an ongoing, internalized commitment. The MFHEA supports this through its capacity-building efforts, offering training, guidelines, and peer learning opportunities to help institutions transition smoothly.
Â
Student-centered quality culture
Â
One of the most significant changes in the revised standards is the inclusion of student involvement in the quality process. Students are now seen not only as recipients of education, but as active participants in shaping its quality. From course evaluation surveys to representation on quality committees, their voices are an integral part of institutional development.
Â
This is a reflection of a wider European trend, where student feedback is considered a vital parameter for assessing the relevance and effectiveness of educational programmes. For institutions in Malta, this means creating real opportunities for student engagement and acting transparently on the basis of their contributions.
Â
Preparing for external quality audits
Â
Another important component of the new process is the external quality assurance audit (EQA), which institutions must undergo every five years. The audit assesses the effectiveness of the internal quality assurance system and verifies whether the institution meets the MFHEA’s key indicators and standards.
Â
Preparing for the EQA audit is a rigorous process that involves gathering evidence, aligning policies, and documenting procedures across departments. Institutions often find this to be a valuable exercise, not only to meet regulatory requirements, but also to identify areas for strategic development.
Â
Institutions that have successfully completed the audit process report better internal communication, clearer roles and responsibilities, and a more consistent educational offering. In this way, quality assurance becomes a strategic tool for institutional transformation, not just a control point.
Â
Challenges and opportunities
Â
The implementation of these quality standards is not without its challenges. Smaller institutions may face resource limitations, while others may struggle with change management or staff resistance. However, MFHEA took a collaborative approach, engaging stakeholders in consultations and offering technical assistance to facilitate implementation.
Â
There are also significant opportunities. Institutions that invest in quality assurance can improve their reputation, attract international partnerships and increase student satisfaction and employability outcomes. In the long term, a strong culture of quality can contribute to Malta’s global competitiveness as a destination for higher education.
Â
A long-term vision for quality and trust
Â
MFHEA’s renewed focus on MFHEA Malta quality assurance represents more than a regulatory update – it signals a strategic shift towards building trust and long-term sustainability in the education sector. Institutions that actively align with this vision will be better prepared to respond to future challenges, including digital innovation, changing student expectations, and labor market demands.
Â
As Malta consolidates its role as a quality-oriented educational hub, the success of the new accreditation process will depend on the ability of institutions to incorporate quality practices into their day-to-day operations. For students, this means better learning outcomes. For suppliers, this is a strategic opportunity to improve institutional credibility, resilience and international attractiveness.
Â
Whether your institution is preparing for an external audit or looking to strengthen its internal culture of quality, Malta Quality Education is a qualified partner ready to guide you every step of the way.